Orleans Central Supervisory Union
130 Kinsey Road
Barton, VT 05822
phone: (802) 525 - 1204
  • Home
    • Lake Region Union Elementary-Middle School District
    • Lake Region Union High School District
    • COVID-19 info >
      • COVID Archive 21-22
    • Recovery Plan
    • Archive >
      • Integrated Field Review
  • About OCSU
    • Central Office >
      • Superintendent
    • Central Orleans Family Education Center
    • Albany Community School
    • Barton Academy & Graded School
    • Brownington Central School
    • Glover Community School
    • Irasburg Village School
    • Orleans Elementary School
    • Lake Region Union High School
    • North Country Career Center
    • Employment Opportunities
  • School Boards
    • Board Agendas & Minutes >
      • Board Agendas & Minutes 2022-2023
      • Board Agendas & Minutes 2021-2022
      • Board Agendas & Minutes 2020-2021
      • Board Agendas & Minutes Archives
    • School Board Members
    • Board Annual Reports
    • OCSU Policies
    • Strategic Plan
  • Community Resources
    • Calendar
    • Public Notices & Information
    • Curriculum
    • Health Services
    • School Choice
    • Student Support Services >
      • MTSS Field Guide
    • English Language Learners
    • Volunteer/Chaperone Opportunities
    • OCSU Facilities Information
    • Recovery Plan and ESSER Funds
  • Staff Resources
    • Standards board >
      • Local Standards Board
      • Regional Admin Standards Board
    • Educational Support Team
    • Employee Resources
    • Forms & Procedures
    • Finance Forms
    • Social Media
    • Health and Wellness
    • Web resources >
      • Docusped
      • Tech Support Portal
      • OCSU Email Access
      • Rubicon
      • Eureka Math
      • VT Online Licensing System for Educators
      • SmartFind Absence Management
    • Supervision & Evaluation
  • Equity
    • OCSU Statement on Equity
    • Equity Resources
  • Teaching & Learning
    • Professional Learning >
      • Professional Learning Plan
      • Professional Learning Calendar
      • Proficiency-Based Learning
      • PowerSchool
      • Mandatory Trainings
      • OCSU PD YouTube channel
    • Curriculum, Instruction, & Assessment >
      • OCSU Curriculum
      • Assessment Calendar

Proficiency-Based Asessment, Grading and Reporting

10/27/2017

3 Comments

 
By: Michael D. Moriarty Ed.D.

​Questions around proficiency-based learning that we have been mulling over in OCSU is: 1.) How do we change our conversations about grading and reporting to reflect a student’s performance towards proficiency? 2.) How do ensure that our reporting practices reflect equity for all types of learning? If you look back historically you will find that the way educators have reported out on learning has not changed much since the late 1800s.
Picture
Picture
The images of report cards above represent a slice of grading and reporting out on student learning over the decades since the inception of a report card. Some might notice that not much has changed from the traditional model, which is concerning considering how different the World is in 2017 compared to the late 1800s. (Hint: Think Iphone 8 vs. Alexander Graham Bell’s patent for the first telephone in 1876!)

When reflecting with teacher leaders in OCSU about research by Gobble et al. (2017) and the above questions of changing the conversation about grading and reporting, as well as the equity of grading & reporting practices, they had this to say:
  • We need to identify and agree on the issues with the current system (like the grading flaws of: zeros, weighted grades, reward/punishment grades, and averages)  This is going to be a huge mindset change, starting with the identification and discussion.
  • I believe that we need to have the time to collaborate and identify what proficiency looks like.  If we want our reporting practices to reflect equity then all teachers reporting out should have the same knowledge and expectations.
  • We need to stay focused on the evidence!  Evidence based grading is the accurate interpretation of student performance.  This approach should encourage continuous improvement, self-analysis and mindful development!!!  
  • Focus on proficiency-based grading instead of standard grading.  This will prevent students from being “penalized” for not understanding material the first time, having a “bad testing day”, etc.​

Proficiency-based learning and proficiency-based assessment fosters better communication about teaching and learning practices. Take for example this standards-based report card from Natomas Unified School District:

Picture
Question what is different about this report card and the report cards pictured above. The imagery of the student-parent-teacher feedback loop becomes a whole lot different when there is clear distinction between progress toward academic learning targets and academic habits, as well as other transferable skills. Furthermore, proficiency-based grading applied focuses on integrating evidence into grading and reporting practices. Gobble et al. (2017) visualize it this way:
Picture
In sum, are you ready to change your grading and reporting practices? If so, consider a different approach to assessment and communication of student learning. As one of our teacher leaders quoted: "our system (of grading and reporting) should be one that is focused on continuous improvement, self-analysis, and mindful development for both student and teacher.”

Reference(s):
Gobble, T., Onuscheck, M., Reibel, A.R., & Twadell, E. (2017). Pathways to proficiency:
           Implementing evidence-based grading. Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree Press.
3 Comments
Carol Woodard
10/27/2017 02:12:53 pm

I disagree with the "exceeds," "met," etc. rubric language. How is that fundamentally different from letter grades. Those monikers are still open to interpretation, even if all teachers "agree" what it looks like. I think the rubric language needs to be much more specific in order to give clearer feedback as to where the student's work and habits of mind actually fall.

Reply
Jennie Lund
10/27/2017 03:08:40 pm

Where the language is different is in the rubric itself. For example, the "proficient" category should have very clear language for what proficient looks like. "I can write a topic sentence that responds to the prompt and previews what is to follow in the paragraph." That is a very different "Met" or "Proficient" than what rubric language was like in the past ("the student wrote a beginning sentence that mostly met the standard") .

Reply
Carol
10/28/2017 11:04:50 am

I agree with you Jennie. If you look at the example above, it is a typical report card- open for interpretation. You can see for ELA grade 3 it does not have "I can" or even "the student can..." statements.




Leave a Reply.

    The place to find information about curriculum, instruction, and assessment in the Orleans Central Supervisory Union.

    Michael D. Moriarty

    Director of Curriculum, Instruction, and Grants

    Archives

    October 2020
    August 2019
    February 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    September 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    February 2018
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016

    Categories

    All
    Formative Assessment
    Learning Outcomes
    PBL
    Student Engagement
    Tech Tips

    RSS Feed

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.